Home » Posts tagged 'Science and Technology'

Tag Archives: Science and Technology

Sony introduces smartwatch compatible with Android phones

 SmartWatch 2 is designed to complement a phone - specifically those running Android 4.0 or later.

SmartWatch 2 is designed to complement a phone – specifically those running Android 4.0 or later.
Image courtesy of Sony

NEW YORK – Sony says its new computerized wristwatch will sell for $200 in the U.S. and will work with a variety of Android phones.

Sony’s SmartWatch 2 hasn’t gotten as much attention as Samsung Electronics Co.’s Galaxy Gear, but it’s cheaper and compatible with a broader range of phones. The Gear costs $300 and currently works only with the company’s Galaxy Note 3 phone.

Read More: Galaxy Gear smartwatch earns points for app ecosystem, but lacks in battery life

Unlike the Gear, however, Sony’s watch doesn’t let you make phone calls directly through the wristwatch. You can answer calls using the watch, but you need a Bluetooth wireless headset linked to the phone if you don’t want to hold it to your ear.

Sony Corp. said Tuesday that the watch is available immediately through the company’s physical and online stores. Other online retailers will also sell it.

sony-smartwatch2

As more people own smartphones and tablets, consumer-electronics companies are creating a new category of products to give consumers more ways to stay connected — and to spend money. Qualcomm Inc. also plans to release a smartwatch in time for the holidays, while Apple is widely believed to be developing an iWatch.

The company said its smartwatch is designed to perform common tasks such as checking texts and email, liking Facebook posts and getting calendar reminders. Reply capabilities will be limited; you can respond to a text from a list of emoticons or preset messages, for instance.

“The average smartphone user reaches for their device more than 100 times per day to check text messages, read emails and social network notifications and of course, to check the time,” Ravi Nookala, U.S. president of Sony Mobile Communications, said in a statement.

“SmartWatch 2 makes these core tasks easier, and does much more with apps available, for everything from productivity to fitness and games.”

SmartWatch 2 is designed to complement a phone — specifically those running Android 4.0 or later. Sony promises three to four days of battery life between charges, compared with about a day for the Gear. The display measures 1.6 inches diagonally, the same as the Gear.

Separately, Sony announced the U.S. availability of two new phones:

— The Xperia Z Ultra is a larger version of its Xperia Z waterproof smartphone. It has a 6.4-inch screen, among the largest out there. A standard version will retail for $650, while a faster, 4G LTE version will sell for $680.

— The Xperia Z1 is a 5-inch phone that sports a massive 20.7-megapixel camera and is capable of attaching better lenses. That retails for $670.

The phones won’t be locked to a specific wireless carrier, but they won’t work with Verizon or Sprint’s network. Sony did not announce plans for locked, subsidized versions that require two-year service agreements.

© The Canadian Press, 2013

Here’s what an Apple Watch try-on appointment is like

 TORONTO – Apple is completely changing its in-store retail experience with the Apple Watch.

During the initial launch, the smartwatch will be sold “exclusively online” and potential buyers are being invited to book special try-on appointments to see the watch before ordering. But what exactly is a try-on appointment?

Apple describes the Apple Watch as its “most personal device yet” – and what could more personal than having someone delicately slip an Apple Watch onto your wrist?

READ MORE: Apple Watch is now available for pre-order

When you first start your try-on appointment, the Apple specialist will ask what Apple Watch models you are most interested in – like the 38mm stainless steel case with the Milanese loop strap, for example.

The watches are housed in a hidden drawer in the Apple Watch try-on table. Apple employees open the drawer by holding up their mobile payment device to the drawer.

Here’s where things get fancy. The specialist will remove a watch from the case, hold it up for you to see and then promptly whip out a cleaning cloth to carefully wipe off any fingerprints on the screen.

“Is it okay if I put the watch on for you,” asked the specialist before slipping it on my wrist for the first time.

Once on, the specialist will turn on the screen, which runs through a basic demo.

The watch will scroll through some features, showing you watch faces, screen savers, the contacts app and messages. You’ll also get to experience the watch’s haptic feedback feature – which vibrates to notify you of messages or even send your heartbeat to someone.

But this demo is mostly visual – you aren’t able to do much else but scroll through the various demo items.

WATCH: Release of the Apple Watch

Once the demo is over, the specialist will ask what other watch models you would like to try on.

If you choose, you can try on both the 38mm and 42mm version of your desired watch to judge size.

Once your 15 minutes is up, the idea is you will have a better understanding of what watch you will go home and order online. There will be no walking in and walking out with a watch.

But for some, the appointment may feel more like a suit or dress fitting, rather the first step in buying a gadget.

Apple’s employees appear to have been instructed to provide style feedback – they may offer advice on what watch size will look best on your wrist, or what band suits your “look.”

During my appointment, the specialist thought the larger 42mm case looked good on me. I preferred the smaller 38mm version.

READ MORE: Buying an Apple Watch isn’t as simple as you may think

Trying on the top-of-the-line 18-carat gold Apple Watch Edition, however, is an entirely different process.edition-apple

Those who want the experience will have to book a specific Apple Watch Edition appointment. According to reports from 9to5Mac, these customers are brought into a different area of the store and the watches are presented in special leather boxes. It’s been said these customers will get more than 15 minutes with the watch.

Only two Canadian stores will be offering the Apple Watch Edition try-on appointments – Toronto’s Eaton’s Centre and Montreal’s Sainte-Catherine location.

Apple said everyone who comes into the store is welcome to try the watch, but they encourage making an appointment to cut down on wait times.

Of course, you can skip all of this by ordering your device online, if you know exactly what configuration you want – keeping in mind there are 54 possible configurations in all.

© Shaw Media, 2015

American Head Shapes Have Been Changing, But Why?

White Amer­i­cans’ heads and faces have been chang­ing in shape on av­er­age, and no one knows quite why, ac­cord­ing to new re­search.

In a trend that can be iden­ti­fied go­ing back to the mid-1800s, U.S. skulls have got­ten big­ger, taller and nar­rower as seen from the front, said Rich­ard and Lee Jantz, a husband-and-wife team of fo­ren­sic an­thro­po­l­o­gists at the Uni­vers­ity of Ten­nes­see, Knox­ville. They al­so found that faces have be­come sig­nif­i­cantly nar­rower and higher, though this shift is less pro­nounced than those af­fect­ing the whole cra­ni­um.

An 1847 pho­to of famed Mas­sa­chu­setts sen­a­tor Dan­iel Web­ster (left) and a mod­ern pho­to of pres­i­den­tial can­di­date and form­er Mas­sa­chu­setts gov­er­nor Mitt Rom­ney (right). Their faces may be il­lus­tra­tive of gen­er­al trends af­fect­ing Amer­i­can skulls and faces: they have be­come taller and nar­rower on av­er­age since Web­ster’s time, ac­cord­ing to an­thro­pol­o­gist Rich­ard Jantz. The se­lec­tion of these two faces and pho­tos is un­sci­en­tif­ic and they have not been scaled to show their true rel­a­tive sizes.

The changes con­tin­ue in­to the genera­t­ion born in the 1980s, from which come the lat­est skulls avail­a­ble for the re­search, ac­cord­ing to the Jantzes, who pre­sented their find­ings April 14 at the an­nu­al meet­ing in Port­land, Ore. of Amer­i­can As­socia­t­ion of Phys­i­cal An­thro­po­l­o­gists.

“I don’t have any rea­son to be­lieve” the changes have stopped, said Rich­ard Jantz in an in­ter­view.

He cit­ed dra­mat­ic in­creases in the avail­abil­ity of nu­tri­tion, bet­ter med­i­cal care and low­er in­fant mor­tal­ity as pos­si­ble fac­tors be­hind the changes, but ex­pressed pes­si­mism that a de­fin­i­tive rea­son can be iden­ti­fied. The sheer num­ber of changes that have swept Amer­i­can life make that an “end­lessly com­pli­cat­ed” prop­o­si­tion, he said.

“We are liv­ing in an en­vi­ron­ment that’s to­tally dif­fer­ent from what’s ev­er ex­isted in the past. It’s like put­ting ex­pe­ri­men­tal an­i­mals in an ex­treme en­vi­ron­ment.”

A larg­er head could al­low for great­er in­tel­li­gence, but it’s un­clear wheth­er the in­creases are re­lat­ed to im­prove­ments in in­tel­li­gence scores, Jantz said. Some as­pects of the shifts in skull shape aren’t nec­es­sarily healthy. Ear­li­er pu­ber­ty, which has led to re­ports of girls get­ting preg­nant be­fore their teens, may be re­flected in the ear­li­er clos­ing in youth of a se­par­a­tion in the bone struc­ture of the skull called the sphe­no-occi­pit­al syn­chon­dro­sis, he ob­served. Amer­i­ca’s obes­ity ep­i­dem­ic is the lat­est de­vel­op­ment that could af­fect skele­tal shape, Jantz said, but its pre­cise ef­fects are as yet un­clear.

Al­though the changes in skull struc­ture may be likely to go on, “they don’t nec­es­sarily have to con­tin­ue in the same di­rec­tion,” he added.

The re­search only ass­essed Amer­i­cans of Eu­ro­pe­an an­ces­try be­cause these pro­vid­ed the larg­est sam­ple sizes to work with, said Jantz. Over 1,500 skulls were in­clud­ed in the re­search, many of them com­ing from the do­nat­ed col­lec­tion at the Uni­vers­ity of Ten­nes­see.

The av­er­age height from the base to the top of the skull in males has in­creased by 8 mil­lime­ters (0.3 inch­es), the Jantzes found; skull size has grown by 200 cu­bic mil­lime­ters, a space equiv­a­lent to a cou­ple of small peas. In fe­males, the cor­res­pond­ing increases are 7 mil­lime­ters and 180 cu­bic mil­lime­ters.

Changes in skele­tal struc­ture are tak­ing place in many parts of the globe, not just the Un­ited States, Jantz said. But they tend to be less well stud­ied else­where, with the ex­cep­tion of a well-doc­u­ment­ed in­crease in hu­man height across the in­dus­t­ri­al­ized world in re­cent cen­turies. “From what we know, in Eu­rope there are some” shifts in skull shape, Jantz said, but “not as dra­mat­ic as seen in the U.S.”

Jantz tends to fo­cus on life­style as a prin­ci­ple rea­son for the changes, not hu­man ev­o­lu­tion, al­though he said he does­n’t rule out the lat­ter. The trend in skull shape “tracks calo­ries avail­a­ble pret­ty strong­ly” in the in­dus­t­ri­al­ized world, he not­ed.

The ob­served growth in skull height is to some ex­tent part of an over­all doc­u­mented in­crease in whole-body height. But Jantz has found that the skull-height in­creases are con­sid­er­a­bly out of pro­por­tion to those else­where the body, and al­so have con­tin­ued where­as the over­all height­en­ing has slowed or stopped in re­cent years.

Adapted from: World Science

People prone to rage attacks found to have smaller “emotional brains”

Peo­ple who are prone to rage at­tacks have smaller “emo­tional brains,” ac­cord­ing to a new study based on brain scans.

Re­search­ers con­clud­ed that peo­ple with this con­di­tion, called in­ter­mit­tent ex­plo­sive dis­or­der, have less “gray mat­ter”—brain tis­sue made of nerve cell­s—in the so-called fron­to­lim­bic re­gions of the brain, struc­tures that reg­u­late emo­tions.

These brain ar­eas play an im­por­tant role in the bi­ol­o­gy of ag­gres­sive be­hav­ior, ac­cord­ing to sci­en­tists. An ar­ti­cle on the new find­ings is pub­lished in the in­au­gu­ral is­sue of the jour­nal Bi­o­log­i­cal Psy­chi­a­try: Cog­ni­tive Neu­ro­sci­ence and Neu­roimag­ing.

The find­ings “sug­gest that dis­rupted de­vel­op­ment of the brain’s emotion-regulating cir­cuit­ry may un­der­lie an in­di­vid­u­al’s propens­ity for rage and ag­gres­sion,” said the jour­nal’s ed­i­tor, Cam­er­on Cart­er of the Un­ivers­ity of Cal­i­for­nia, Da­vis.

In­ter­mit­tent ex­plo­sive dis­or­der is de­fined as “re­cur­rent, prob­lem­at­ic, im­pul­sive ag­gres­sion,” ex­plained Emil Coc­caro of the Un­ivers­ity of Chi­ca­go, the ar­ti­cle’s lead au­thor.

“While more com­mon than bi­po­lar dis­or­der and schiz­o­phre­nia com­bined, many in the sci­en­tif­ic and lay com­mun­i­ties be­lieve that im­pul­sive ag­gres­sion is simply ‘bad be­hav­ior’ that re­quires an ‘at­ti­tude ad­just­ment.’”

But the new da­ta con­firm that the con­di­tion is “a brain dis­or­der and not simply a dis­or­der of ‘per­sonal­ity,’” he added. More gen­er­al­ly, smaller fron­tolim­bic gray mat­ter vol­ume cor­re­lates to more ag­gres­sion, he said.

The in­ves­ti­ga­tors col­lect­ed high-resolution brain scans in 168 people, in­clud­ing 57 sub­jects with the dis­or­der, 53 healthy con­trol sub­jects, and 58 psy­chi­at­ric con­trol sub­jects. Us­ing the scans, tak­en with the tech­nique known as mag­net­ic res­o­nance im­ag­ing, the re­search­ers said they found a di­rect link be­tween his­to­ry of ac­tu­al ag­gres­sive be­hav­ior and smaller gray mat­ter vol­ume.

Adapted from: World Science

“Humanized” Mice!

In­tro­duc­ing a “hu­man­ized” ver­sion of a lan­guage-linked gene in­to mice ac­cel­er­ates their learn­ing, ac­cord­ing to a stu­dy.

The gene, called Foxp2, is of a type known as tran­scrip­tion fac­tor—a gene that con­trols the ac­ti­vity of oth­er genes. It has al­so been linked to the de­vel­op­ment of hu­man speech and lan­guage. The gene is found in both hu­mans and mice, in slightly dif­fer­ent forms.

In the new stu­dy, re­search­ers cre­at­ed mice whose ver­sion of the Foxp2 gene had changes in two key ami­no acids—some­what equiv­a­lent to two “let­ters” of its ge­net­ic code. The changes were de­signed to make the gene more si­m­i­lar to hu­man Foxp2.

The study aimed at learn­ing “how ge­net­ic changes might have adapted the nerv­ous sys­tem” to lan­guage and speech, wrote the sci­en­tists, Ann Gray­biel of the Mas­sa­chu­setts In­sti­tute of Tech­nol­o­gy and col­leagues. The re­port ap­peared Sept. 15 on­line in the jour­nal Pro­ceed­ings of the Na­t­ional Acad­e­my of Sci­ences.

The re­port, how­ev­er, did­n’t ad­dress what some sci­en­tists have de­scribed as eth­i­cal ques­tions posed by the mix­ing of hu­man and an­i­mal genes. One con­cern, for ex­am­ple, is that hu­man­ity might even­tu­ally have to con­front the weighty is­sue of wheth­er an an­i­mal with some hu­man genes de­serves hu­man rights.

Gray­biel and col­leagues found that the two-“letter” change af­fect­ed a part of the mouse brain known as the stria­tum and re­lat­ed cir­cuits called the cortico-basal gan­glia. These ar­eas are “known to be es­sen­tial for mo­tor and cog­ni­tive be­hav­iors such as speech and lan­guage ca­pa­bil­i­ties in hu­mans,” ex­plained a sum­mary of the re­port is­sued by the jour­nal.

Dif­fer­ent por­tions of the stria­tum un­der­lie two modes of learn­ing con­sid­ered cru­cial for speech and lan­guage, the re­search­ers said. One is a con­scious form of learn­ing called de­clar­a­tive learn­ing; the oth­er, a non-con­scious form called pro­ce­du­ral learn­ing.

In a se­ries of maze ex­pe­ri­ments, mice with the “hu­man­ized” gene learn­ed stimulus-response as­socia­t­ions more rap­idly than reg­u­lar mice when both de­clar­a­tive and pro­ce­du­ral forms of learn­ing were en­gaged, the in­ves­ti­ga­tors re­ported.

Parts of the stria­tum as­sociated with these two modes of learn­ing were found to re­spond dif­fer­ently in the mice, as judged by lev­els of dopamine, a mes­sen­ger chem­i­cal in the brain; by gene ac­ti­vity pat­terns; and by change­abil­ity in the strength of brain con­nec­tions, known as syn­ap­tic plas­ti­city. The find­ings sug­gest that the hu­manized gene dif­fer­ently in­flu­ences how dif­fer­ent re­gions of the stria­tum con­trib­ute to learn­ing, said the re­search­ers, who spec­u­late that these ef­fects may have con­trib­uted to the emer­gence of hu­man lan­guage.

Adapted from: World Science